Local parallel-agent app
FlareCode vs Conductor
Conductor runs your agents while you watch. FlareCode runs your repo portfolio while you sleep.
Conductor is a Mac app that runs agents like Claude Code and Codex in parallel on your machine, each in its own git worktree — your laptop is the compute and you bring your own agent subscriptions. FlareCode is hosted: agents run in isolated cloud sandboxes that keep going after you close the lid, with a durable encrypted workspace and PR review from your phone. The choice is local control versus cloud continuity.
Context
What is Conductor?
Conductor (by Melty Labs) is a macOS app that runs multiple coding agents — Claude Code, Codex, and others — in parallel, each isolated in its own git worktree, then helps you review and merge their PRs. The app is free; you bring your own agent subscriptions (e.g. your Claude Code login). It runs locally on your Mac, so the work is tied to your machine being on.
Portfolio
Built around many repos, many agents, and one fleet rail.
Evidence
Tests, browser checks, diffs, logs, and PRs stay visible before review.
Policy
Spend caps, branch scope, secrets, egress, and human merge gates stay product-level.
Side by side
The breakdown
| FlareCode | Conductor | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud control tower for a repo portfolio — persistent agent workspaces, fleet state, evidence, cost policy, and reviewed PRs | Mac app orchestrating local agents |
| Where it runs | Hosted cloud sandbox, one per agent — nothing to install | Your Mac (local git worktrees) |
| How you work | Describe → walk away → review the PR | Drive parallel local agents; review + merge |
| Autonomy loop | Plans, writes code, runs your tests, fixes its own failures | Runs the agent you choose; orchestrates + merges |
| Self-verifies | Tests must pass + opens the app in a real browser; shows you the proof | Depends on the agent you run |
| Learns your repos | Learns each repo — past goals/PRs recalled into planning | Whatever your agent remembers (e.g. CLAUDE.md) |
| Multi-repo | First-class — a fleet view across many projects and repos | Parallel local worktrees |
| Runs while laptop is closed | Yes — cloud compute | No — needs your machine on |
| Async / mobile review | Core to the product — Slack, GitHub mobile, email | Desktop app, tied to your Mac |
| Workspace | Durable, encrypted, backed up — survives idle + restarts | Local git worktrees on your machine |
| Model choice | Bundled Kimi K2.6, or BYOK (Claude, GPT, Gemini, OpenRouter, custom) | Whatever your Claude Code / Codex login uses |
| Pricing model | Flat plans, inference at provider cost, true BYOK | Free app; bring your own agent subscription |
| Per-task spend limit | Predictable — a per-task spend limit you set | Your provider's own limits |
| Setup | Connect a repo — nothing to install | Install the Mac app + agents |
| Open source | Closed platform; public issues + roadmap on GitHub | No — proprietary Mac app |
Honest take
Where each one wins
Where FlareCode pulls ahead
- Cloud compute: tasks keep running after you close the lid — no machine to keep awake.
- Async, mobile-first review — approve and merge from Slack, GitHub mobile, or email.
- A durable, encrypted workspace backed up off your machine, including from-scratch projects.
- Nothing to install and not Mac-only — connect a repo from any browser.
- Bundled inference with a $100/mo free model, plus a predictable per-task spend limit.
- Keys and egress are contained by the platform: your API keys are brokered server-side and never reach the sandbox, and outbound to cloud-metadata and internal hosts is blocked (verified) — controls a tool running on your own machine can't enforce.
Where Conductor is the better pick
- Local control: agents run on your own machine with your own subscriptions.
- No per-task platform fee — you pay only your agent subscriptions.
- Native Mac UX, and your code never leaves your laptop.
- Use the exact agents (Claude Code, Codex) and logins you already have.
FAQ
FlareCode vs Conductor
>Is FlareCode a Conductor alternative?
Yes, for builders who'd rather not tie agent work to a local machine. Conductor orchestrates agents on your Mac in parallel worktrees; FlareCode runs them in the cloud so they keep going after you close the laptop, with a durable workspace and PR review from anywhere.
>Does FlareCode need a Mac app?
No. FlareCode is hosted — you connect a GitHub repo and use the web app, Slack, or GitHub mobile. There's nothing to install, and it isn't limited to macOS.
>What about my own agent subscriptions?
Conductor uses your existing Claude Code or Codex logins. FlareCode bundles inference (Kimi K2.6, with a $100/mo free allowance) and also supports BYOK, so you can bring an Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, or custom OpenAI-compatible key and pay inference at cost.
>Does the work survive a restart?
On Conductor, work lives in local git worktrees on your machine. On FlareCode, each workspace is encrypted and continuously backed up, so an idle pause, a restart, or an eviction doesn't lose your work.
Sources checked: Conductor parallel agents
Comparisons reflect public information and change over time. Something out of date? tell us.
Bottom line
Which should you pick?
Conductor runs your agents while you watch; FlareCode runs your repo portfolio while you sleep. Choose Conductor if you want agents running locally on your own Mac with your own subscriptions and full local control. Choose FlareCode if you want the work to continue in the cloud after you walk away, reviewed from your phone, across many repos.
Get started
Try FlareCode
free to start · usage billed at cost · cancel anytime